Is owning an electric vehicle worth it?

Is owning an electric vehicle worth it?

Is owning an electric vehicle worth it?

Written by Ahmad Halak

EVs have come along away, with significant improvements in range, performance and options over the last years. Overall, EVs seem to be more comfortable and provide a better driving experience. Owning an EV is cheaper when it comes to maintenance, fuel, and insurance. More government subsidies are needed to incentivize adoption in key areas.

In this article, we will go over all of the market options available for consumers today and the various aspects of owning an electric vehicle (EV) including the environmental impacts. We will also compare the costs of owning an EV versus a gasoline powered model using a combination of own and online calculator tools available to consumers. Namely, we will compare the 2020 Chevrolet Bolt EV to its gasoline equivalent, the 2020 Chevrolet Spark.

EVs, hybrids, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV) are variations of battery-based vehicles offered in Canada and globally. A typical price range for non-luxury EVs in Canada is $38-45k. There have been significant improvements in affordability and in battery technology, leading to increase in driving range of EVs. In 2015, the battery represented about 57% of the cost, 33% in 2019 and is forecasted to be at 20% by 2025, according to Bloomberg NEF.

Adoption has been slowly increasing in Canada. In 2019 EVs represented 1.6% of new registration compared to 0.2% in 2015. Approximately, 95% of all registered EVs in Canada are in Quebec, Ontario, and British Columbia. Most EVs in Canada are registered in regions with current or previous rebate programs. The Canadian government had set targets for zero-emission vehicles (ZEV) reaching 10% of light-duty vehicles (LDV) sales per year by 2025, 30% by 2030, and 100% by 2040. Quebec for example has an EV policy mandate which requires automakers to set EV sales targets.

Under the federal Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEV) program, battery-electric, hydrogen fuel cell, and longer-range plug-in hybrid vehicles are eligible for an incentive of $5,000 towards leasing or purchasing ( list of eligible ZEV ) a. British Columbia and Quebec are the only provinces that offer $5,000 and $8,000 in rebates respectively in addition to the $5,000 federal rebate.

Below is a select list of the cheapest EVs in Canada and their associated ranges. Notice that all vehicles are under the $45,000 MSRP mark, which is a generally accepted maximum for non-luxury EVs in the market today.

 

Sub-compact Electric Vehicles (EVs) Comparison (2020 Models)

Vehicle Base Price Base Range Battery Capacity Warranty
Volkswagen e-Golf $37,895 198 KM 35.8 kWh 4 yr/80,000 basic
Nissan Leaf $44,298 243 KM 40 kWh 3 yr/60,000 km Basic
Chevrolet Bolt $44,998 417 KM 60 kwh 3-year/60,000 km Basic
Tesla Model 3 $44,999 402 KM 75 Kwh 4 yr/80,000 km Basic

The 2020 Chevrolet Bolt offers more range than its competitors while offering great electrical efficiency as shown by the range and battery capacity. The Bolt is also one of the most award winning EVs in the market today, winning two Motor Trend Car of the Year awards, and continues to rank high among EV enthusiasts for its superior road performance.

 

Are EVs practical?

For most drivers, the deciding factor for when buying an electric car is the type of usage. If you mainly use your car for short and urban like commutes, and there is sufficient access to chargers at both ends of your trip, owning an EV is a good fit for you. However, drivers need to plan carefully, as battery charging time can be very long depending on the type of charging stations you have access to.

There are perks to driving an EV depending on where you live. You may be able to drive in the carpool lane on the highway without having to carry additional riders, get free street-parking, and reserved spots in municipal and/or airport parking lots. Range anxiety is no longer an issue for EVs, thanks to rapid improvements in technology.

There are a ton of misconceptions around range anxiety associated with EVs, and it has had a detrimental effect on adoption. Range anxiety is the fear of not being able to drive very far. For the vehicles we have shown above, range anxiety is clearly not an issue, since new EVs can go between 200 and 500 kilometers on a single charge. According to Helen Boroadbent, a post-graduate researcher in EVs at the University of NSW, 60KMs is enough range for about 80% of day-to-day driving, while a 170KM range is sufficient for 99% of driving trips.

Another factor contributing to range anxiety is the charging time. Depending on the level of charging you are using, charging time can range between 30 mins and 8 hours for a full charge. This also depends on battery and charging capacity of an EV. The levels of charging are discussed at a later section of this article.

Access to localized and visible charging infrastructure is key to alleviate consumer concerns about the availability of charging stations for their vehicles. As EVs become more popular, the availability of EV charging stations increases. Even if EVs are relatively common where you live, there is still a legitimate concern about the availability of infrastructure when traveling on long road trips. Part of the solution is for governments to invest more in EV infrastructure both in communities and in major corridors. To deal with this issue, the federal government announced through Budget 2019 that it will spend $130 million over five years to deploy a network of zero-emission vehicle charging stations (level 2 and higher) across the country.

 

How well does an EV perform?

By most measures, today’s EVs offer a similar driving experience to gasoline-powered vehicles, if not better. Overall, EVs have faster acceleration, better handling, more powerful braking systems and very quiet engines. All this points to a comfortable and smooth ride.

EVs are often at the top of their class in terms of crash and safety ratings. Since EVs have fewer components than traditional vehicles and thus, more space available, manufacturers are able to innovate in vehicle safety. Battery packs lower the center of gravity and result in a more rigid frame. Since EVs are powered by batteries as opposed to traditional gasoline powered engines, they are also less prone to fire. This is evident when comparing insurance costs between an EV and a comparable gasoline vehicle, which we demonstrate in a later section.

 

EVs require less service than gasoline-powered vehicles

In addition to fuel savings, EVs also require less maintenance. Since an EV is fully electric, changing oil, flushing the cooling system, servicing the transmission, changing air filter, spark plugs and drive belts are no longer required. EVs also have regenerative braking and resistive friction which means that breaks will not wear out as fast. This is also true for a lot of other major repairs associated with gas-powered engines due to additional mechanical components and parts.

The lithium-ion cells that power EV engines wear out over time and can be very costly to replace. Battery costs represent about 25% of overall vehicle price but the cost per kilowatt-hour continues to fall. According to the CAA however, battery prices fell by 80% between 2010-2016, suggesting that replacement costs have dropped significantly. However, you can can assume that the original battery will last for the lifetime of your vehicle. This is consistent with available evidence suggesting that EV battery degradation has not been a widespread problem.

 

EVs do not emit emissions, but the secondary impact can be seen in production and power supply

Owners choose EVs to help protect the environment. EVs have zero tailpipe emissions and the rechargeable battery in EVs means that all energy can be sourced domestically which reduces downstream emissions. However, other environmental costs must be considered. Most EV batteries are lithium-ion powered, which requires more energy to manufacture due to the mining and refining process. Lithium-ion batteries are produced in Japan and South Korea, where approximately 25%–40% of electricity generation is from coal. Recycling lithium-ion batteries remains inefficient and only a small share of the material is reusable. Another source of emissions in the production of EVs is the process of making high-performing metals which requires a relatively large amount of energy. The impact of this also depends on the manufacturing country of the vehicle, which could mean a large amount of GHGs emitted during the production process. The Union of Concerned Scientists USA has calculated that a longer-range lithium-ion EV that travels more than 250 miles per charge, creates an additional 6 tons of GHG emissions in the manufacturing process, or up to 68 percent more than a gasoline-powered vehicle.

Used EVs are also another and even more financially and environmentally sustainable way to go. Buying a used EV avoids any incremental environmental impact on your part when it comes to manufacturing EVs. Some vehicles with the inherent range limitations make great pre-owned electric cars since they are likely to have fewer miles, which means less wear and tear.

Although EV motors do not emit CO2 when they run, emissions can still be generated during the generation of electricity that EVs draw upon and store in their batteries. The carbon-intensity of electricity generation varies by province because each province generates electricity using a different mix of energy sources. Provinces like Quebec rely heavily on hydro while Alberta and many other provinces rely on coal. So before thinking of buying an EV, consider the emissions associated with your hydro consumption. As an EV owner, you might make a conscious choice to make use of renewable resources like solar, wind, and water power at your own home. Also, charging your EV at night means you’re using off-peak electricity generated by cleaner energy sources like wind, hydro and nuclear, unlike during the day when natural gas maybe used to meet peak demand.

 

How to power an EV and how much does it cost?

According to EnergySage, EVs are far more efficient than conventional gas-powered vehicles since EV batteries convert 59 to 62 percent of energy into vehicle movement while gas-powered vehicles convert between 17 and 21 percent. This means that the battery system puts more towards powering the vehicle than gasoline-powered cars. Electricity efficiency, or fuel-efficiency for EVs, depends on the weight carried, temperature (colder weather uses more electricity), accessory use, individual driving style (highway driving uses more electricity). Also, the cost of electricity depends on where you live with some jurisdictions imposing peak pricing schemes. This means that it can be significantly cheaper to charge your EV at night vs. the daytime, when peak pricing applies. Off-peak electricity is typically generated by cleaner energy sources like wind, hydro and nuclear, unlike during the day when natural gas may be required to meet peak demand. Check your local power sources and costs before you commit to buying an EV.

There are various ways to charge an EV each comes with its own charging time and costs.

EV Charging Time

Charger level Availability Time to Fully Charge
Level 1 (120 volts) Standard Outlet 65 hours
Level 2 (220/240 volts) Clothes Dryer Outlet, Homes, Apartment Buildings 9 ½ hours
Level 3 DC Fast charging (480 volts) Public Charging Stations, Parking Lots, Work Places 1 hour 20 minutes

Source: EnergySage

Installing a charging station at home is an option but is probably not necessary since an EV can be charged at workplaces or public charging stations. The purchase price of a Level 2 charger is around $600 while parts and labor can add $2,000. Installation costs depend on the age of your home and the location of the desired EV charging station.

 

Comparing the total costs and environmental impacts of EVs and gasoline vehicles

EVs are usually more expensive to buy than gas-powered equivalents, however, they are cheaper on fuel and maintenance and will generate lower life cycle emissions than conventional gasoline vehicles. As mentioned earlier, you may also be eligible for federal and provincial rebates. All these savings would however take years of ownership to recover due to higher purchase costs of EVs.

To truly assess the net financial and environmental benefit of owning an EV, we need to find an EV that has a gasoline-powered comparator. I am going to compare the 2020 Chevrolet Spark (gasoline-powered) and the 2020 Chevrolet Bolt (EV). The Chevrolet Spark is considered to be the most fuel-efficient subcompact vehicle according to the National Research Council. Both vehicles are comparable since they are of the same brand, vehicle class, and even design; the Spark is considered to be the gasoline version of the Bolt. CAA estimates that the average electricity economy is 18.5 kWh/100km for the bolt, while the Spark’s average fuel economy is 7L/100KM.

I have used the CAA’s Driving Costs Calculator which helps compare the long-term costs, including environmental costs, of owning an electric or hybrid versus a gasoline vehicle.

The calculation reveals that the overall costs of owning the bolt EV are higher than the comparable gasoline model. Including car payments, the annual cost of owning an EV and driving 30k KMs is $10,585 versus $9,464 for the gasoline equivalent, the Spark; owning an EV is around $1,123 more expensive per year. This calculation however only looks at the cost of ownership over 7 years, driving more and extending the horizon may tip the calculation in favor of the Bolt. The calculation does not include a salvage or resale value; it is not needed unless the resale value after seven years is disproportionate to the initial cost of the vehicle.

I have used a separate payment calculator to finance the purchase price of the vehicle at 2% APR after applying the sales tax in Ontario (13%) and deducting the $5,000 federal rebate for the Bolt. At the moment, the Ontario government does not offer EV purchase or lease incentives. Check your provincial incentives before committing to buying an EV since it can make the difference between buying and not buying an EV.

For operating costs, and as expected, the Chevrolet Bolt EV beat the Spark in fuel costs, the Spark will cost at least three times as much. Maintenance is also significantly cheaper on the Bolt EV due to the lower complexity of maintenance, as demonstrated in an earlier section of this article. There are also some insurance cost savings, primarily due to the higher safety of EVs in general. The figure below demonstrates the breakdown of operating costs for both vehicles.

Over the seven years, the Spark emits 2.5 times (21 tons) more emissions than the Bolt. The CAA Driving Cost Calculator also estimates the annual tailpipe or energy source emissions, those emissions are associated with burning fossil fuels or the carbon intensity of each kWh which depends on which province you are in. This is a particularly important point to make for those who are considering lowering their impact on the environment by purchasing an EV. Another consideration that was not factored in the CAA Cost Calculator was the production and disposal related emissions. The production of EVs is estimated to emit an additional 6 tons of carbon. The figure below demonstrates the breakdown of emissions for both vehicles for the 7 years. Total Emissions Comparison in Kgs (7-years) and based on 30,000 KMs per Annum.

 

Concluding remarks

EVs have come along away, with significant improvements in range, performance and options over the last years. Overall, EVs seem to be more comfortable and provide a better driving experience. Owning an EV is cheaper when it comes to maintenance, fuel, and insurance. Over the life-cycle of both vehicles we have compared, the Bolt EV delivers exceptional environmental performance.

When it comes to financial feasibility, owning an EV is not there yet in Ontario or other jurisdictions without the $5,000 federal rebate (already in place) in addition to at least $7,900 in local and provincial rebates. That is the subsidy needed to break-even in total costs between the EVs and gasoline powered vehicles in Ontario, and possibly in other jurisdictions without a rebate program.

Related Articles

Should I rent an apartment or buy a condo?

Should I rent an apartment or buy a condo?

Owning a home is not always better than renting. In fact, we demonstrate that in especially hot housing markets like Toronto’s, renting is far cheaper than buying. This is true even when considering moderate future price increases. The example uses the rent vs buy calculator and is based on a 1-bedroom apartment I was trying to decide between buying or renting.

Six common mistakes investors make

Six common mistakes investors make

Trade volumes have skyrocketed over the last decades and since investors from all skill and awareness levels are joining the market, understanding investor psychology is increasingly necessary. Advances in technology have eliminated the obstacles to entry for new investors.

Home ownership, a policy blunder

Home ownership, a policy blunder

Housing is an important issue today and will probably remain so for the foreseeable future. Governments would have to implement land policies and create incentives. I would gear those incentives towards providing housing options by supporting the rental market. Creating options where the market has not provided can restore balance.

Should I rent an apartment or buy a condo?

Should I rent an apartment or buy a condo?

Should I rent an apartment or buy a condo?

Written by Ahmad Halak

Owning a home is not always better than renting. In fact, we demonstrate that in especially hot housing markets like Toronto’s, renting is far cheaper than buying. This is true even when considering moderate future price increases. The example uses the rent vs buy calculator and is based on a 1-bedroom apartment I was trying to decide between buying or renting.

Buying your first home is the single biggest financial decision you will make. Society expects this step in life because it’s considered a sign of financial success. However, this really should be your decision and a financial and personal decision after all. A financial decision means that we’re considering all the costs and the benefits associated with owning and renting a home as well as considering the opportunity costs. Deciding whether or not to own is not always a financial decision, sometimes you would want to move to an area you are only able to buy-in. The reason why I’m stressing the financial part is that it’s the part that’s most overlooked.

In this post, we will go through the rent vs buy calculator published by the New York Times. We will talk about some of the assumptions and considerations as well as the pros and cons of owning and renting. The scenario used in the calculation below is based on living in Toronto, one of the most expensive metropolitan centers in North America. However, the principles and logic are useful regardless of location. I’m hoping that my analysis will help others get their results out of the rent vs buy calculator.

 

Millennials value homeownership but need to pay special attention to the financial aspect

Millennials have been driving the housing market in Canada and the United States for some time now. For example, I am 31 years old and I belong to the millennial genus. I am trying to decide between renting or buying a condo with the same features; location, quality, and square footage. This point is important because it allows for a like-to-like comparison. That’s because I’m not interested in upgrading my standard of living, I’m only interested in knowing whether or not renting is cheaper than buying.

Another calculation can be done on whether or not going from renting an apartment to buying a house as an investment is a good financial decision.

 

The Rent Vs. Buy Calculator 

Factors considered in the analysis

There are various categories of costs included in the rent vs buy calculator. From what I have seen, there is consistency in the variables included among rent vs buy calculators. The calculator works by trying to find the break-even rent, or in other words the rent in which renting or buying is equal in costs. Many homeowners or potential homeowners only look at the mortgage payment when considering the costs of ownership vs rental. However, cash flow analysis is needed for all the costs and the benefits associated with owning and renting. A good financial advisor would guide you through this process before buying a home.

The calculator we are using in this post includes a comprehensive list of costs and variables:

  • Home price
  • How long you plan to stay
  • Mortgage details: Mortgage rate, down payment, and length of the mortgage
  • What the future holds: Home price growth rate, investment return rate, and inflation rate
  • Taxes: The property tax rate and marginal tax rate
  • Closing costs: Cost of buying a home and the cost of selling home
  • Maintenance and fees: Maintenance renovations homeowners insurance additional monthly utilities almond fees and common fees deduction
  • Additional renting costs: One-month security deposit, broker fee, renters insurance

The length of stay is one of the most influential variables in this calculation. For this reason, experts do not recommend owning a home for a period of lesser than 5 years. The longer we intend on keeping the house, the more financially viable it is to own. This depends largely on someone’s family situation as well as their career goals. Owning a home can restrict your ability to take advantage of job opportunities elsewhere.

Some variables included are familiar and depend on your situation. Other costs are not as easy for a typical consumer to take an educated guess on. This includes the home price growth rate, investment return rate, and the inflation rate, which are macroeconomic related variables. We will expand on these variables a bit more below.

Home price growth rate

This is probably one of the most difficult variables to predict or forecast and it’s very specific to the region you live in. Toronto price increases as mentioned earlier have been way above increases in income. Therefore, this trend is not expected to continue, based on fundamentals. I expect prices to keep up with inflation plus some factor for real price growth (in addition to inflation) of 0.5%. This is especially generous since the recent increases are not quite in line with fundamentals and means that the condo market could be overvalued. In the GTA, the ownership costs as a percentage of median household income have grown from 40% in 2001 to about 70% in 2017. This means in Toronto, ownership costs have nearly doubled relative to income over the last 20 years.

Investment return rate

The investment return rate would be your opportunity cost for not paying your debt OR investing in a portfolio of stocks and bonds or even a business you wanted to start. The down payment and subsequent amounts could have been invested or used to pay down loans.

Since I have student loan debt, my opportunity cost, after all, is the interest rate on my loan which is 3.2%.

If you currently don’t have debt then I suggest you use the expected return on your investment. For example, a 50/50% portfolio allocation between stock and bonds is considered a balanced portfolio and carries a moderate amount of risk. You can decide which kind of portfolio or investment strategy better suits you by clicking here.

Inflation rate 

The inflation rate reflects the general increase in prices in the economy. In Canada, we can assume that the inflation rate is going to be the target set by the Bank of Canada, which is 2%. This would be the long-term assumption and fluctuations may occur in the short-term. The Federal Reserve in the U.S. also targets 2% inflation.

Rent growth rate 

Some jurisdictions have rent control and limit the annual increases in rent. I live in Ontario, where rental properties built before 1990 are subject to rent control. This sets a limit on annual increases to rent. From my experience, this limit has been set around the rate of inflation, so I would use the same assumption as the inflation rate, which is 2%. However, the actual increase will depend on your landlord. For example, some landlords may choose to keep the rent the same from year to year to entice a good tenant to stay.

 

Let’s get right into the calculation

Below is a full list of all the variables being considered in the calculator alongside what my assumption is and the rationale for the chosen value. Some of the rationale included are already discussed elsewhere in this article. Sources for the information are also available as links in the rationale section to serve as guidance and help you find information that’s more relevant to you.

 

The Result

The results of the calculation suggest that for the purchase of a $731k condominium and if I expect to live there 5 years, it makes more sense to rent if a similar place is available for $2,653 a month or less. This means that the break-even point between renting and buying is the $2,653 rent per month. I found an apartment that was $1,800 so I would save $853 a month by renting vs buying the same condo or apartment.

 

Can I afford this home?

Down Payment & Other Costs

One question someone needs to ask before buying a home is whether or not they have the minimum required down payment AND all other initial costs. In this example, the minimum payment is $58k but there is also an additional cost of $21k for realtor fees.

Recurring costs 

Even if buying a home makes sense from a financial standpoint, a hard look at your budget before and after owning a home is needed. Recurring costs are higher when owning a home vs renting. Over the 5 years, I intend to stay, owning a home has a total recurring cost of $302k, while renting has total recurring costs of $167k. Owning would double the pressure on my budget, forcing me to make significant sacrifices.

 

The pros and cons of renting and buying

There are pros and cons associated with this decision and someone may decide to purchase or not to purchase a home regardless of what the numbers say. Deciding to purchase a home may not be entirely a financial or investment decision. There can just be a preference for a certain area or even liking the freedom to renovate.

The Canada mortgage housing Corporation (CMHC) has a useful pros and cons list for renting vs buying to help consider other factors in the decision making process.

 

Key takeaways and considerations 

Rent is not comparable to mortgage payments

People often compare mortgage payments to rent, but as we have seen above, there are 27 factors that should be considered in this decision.

 

Forget about the “fear of missing out” and focus on what matters

When markets are doing well, people see prices rising and see a need to partake. They fear they’ll miss out on the increases if they don’t invest today. This could also mean that their dream home could be more expensive in the future as a result of any further increases. In some areas, prices have been rising and incomes are not keeping up. Which means that it is unlikely that those increases will continue. So prudence needs to be exercised on the choice over the appropriate home price growth rate. History does not necessarily predict the future.

This decision also depends on what someone wants in life. Some people want to travel, some want to work as artists and others want to climb the corporate ladder and enjoy the stability of a career. Another question we can ask ourselves is which of the two increases our happiness more, owning material things or experiences?

 

The results of this calculation are always changing

The calculation is sensitive to inputs like home price, interest rate, future property value increase. The calculation is also volatile because we are working with a long time frame of up to 25 years. Consider doing multiple scenarios to address the uncertainty around your chosen values, or if you are not sure about your assumptions.

 

Conclusions

As of today, it doesn’t seem like a good financial decision to buy a condo. Buying a home should be a personal decision and not as a result of societal pressure. What we have learned through this analysis is that comparing rent to a mortgage payment is not accurate.

The results are very sensitive to small changes in some of the assumptions, this also means that the results for this calculation can change over time. There are instances when someone chooses to still buy a home on a more pros and cons basis.

This analysis will be updated regularly to reflect the most recent market trends.

 

 

Related Articles

Should I rent an apartment or buy a condo?

Should I rent an apartment or buy a condo?

Owning a home is not always better than renting. In fact, we demonstrate that in especially hot housing markets like Toronto’s, renting is far cheaper than buying. This is true even when considering moderate future price increases. The example uses the rent vs buy calculator and is based on a 1-bedroom apartment I was trying to decide between buying or renting.

Six common mistakes investors make

Six common mistakes investors make

Trade volumes have skyrocketed over the last decades and since investors from all skill and awareness levels are joining the market, understanding investor psychology is increasingly necessary. Advances in technology have eliminated the obstacles to entry for new investors.

Home ownership, a policy blunder

Home ownership, a policy blunder

Housing is an important issue today and will probably remain so for the foreseeable future. Governments would have to implement land policies and create incentives. I would gear those incentives towards providing housing options by supporting the rental market. Creating options where the market has not provided can restore balance.

Six common mistakes investors make

Six common mistakes investors make

Six common mistakes investors make

Written by Ahmad Halak

Trade volumes have skyrocketed over the last decades and since investors from all skill and awareness levels are joining the market, understanding investor psychology is increasingly necessary. Advances in technology have eliminated the obstacles to entry for new investors.

I have taken stock (no pun intended) of six common mistakes investors make. Financial illiteracy, the use of conventional wisdom, and herding after others are among the causes to blame.

Trade volumes have skyrocketed over the last decades and since investors from all skill and awareness levels are joining the market, understanding investor psychology is increasingly necessary. Advances in technology have eliminated the obstacles to entry for new investors.

In this post, we will provide a list of six common mistakes that investors make when investing in the stock market.

 

Smaller investment horizons and speculation determine stock prices

Short-term volatility in markets exist because of investors’ attitudes. A fresh field called behavioral finance looks at how human opinion and psychology effect investment decisions.

Trading of securities and the tension between supply and demand determine prices. Fundamentals drive long-run prices; they are metrics that test the firm’s value based on economic models and accounting ratios.

Equity prices deviate from long-run sustainable values because of short-term investment horizons and speculation in investment decisions. Adapt to uncertainty with investing styles that depend on fundamentals.

 

Six common mistakes investors make

  1. Investors make their selections based on previously available knowledge. Information learned or shared is not useful if it is data that everybody else knows, it is likely that the price builds in this piece of information.
  2. Investors compare absolute prices when testing value between stocks. Using fundamental analysis and financial ratios are the correct methods to test stocks for the long-term.
  3. Investors rely on risky assets by relying on “technical” analysis. It is the main approach of assessment among non-finance experts. Technical analysis is the technique of identifying patterns in stock prices.
  4. Investors underestimate further losses and further profits: When a stock price is increasing, investors pull-out too quickly. When prices are going down, investors are over-optimistic about restoring their losses and remain invested for too long. There needs to be patience when selling at a profit. Thee decision to act when dealing with a losing investment must be swift. Don’t overestimate your power of recovery from losses.
  5. Investors invest long-term savings in day trading: “putting all your eggs in one basket” and especially in risky investments, can jeopardize your long-term goals. The investment portfolio must match the investment horizon and risk profile of the investor.
  6. Investors ignore the risk to return ratio when picking stocks and rely only on potential earnings. For this purpose, the risk to return ratio (Sharpe ratio) is a useful measure that adjusts return to risk. Higher growth stocks typically have higher returns. However, this higher return potential can mean higher downside risk than say a stable stock with modest returns. So we must adjust returns for risk, since there is a higher risk of loss in the growth stock.

 

Conclusion

If we are aware of the factors above, we can avoid common mistakes, have mental clarity, and understand price swings during both booms and busts. When faced with uncertainty, we should try our best to take only educated risks. One point that can guide your thinking is knowing that in markets, fundamentals prevail overtime.

I hope the above list helps you understand some misconceptions associated with investing and the correct rationale to address them.

 

 

Related Articles

Should I rent an apartment or buy a condo?

Should I rent an apartment or buy a condo?

Owning a home is not always better than renting. In fact, we demonstrate that in especially hot housing markets like Toronto’s, renting is far cheaper than buying. This is true even when considering moderate future price increases. The example uses the rent vs buy calculator and is based on a 1-bedroom apartment I was trying to decide between buying or renting.

Six common mistakes investors make

Six common mistakes investors make

Trade volumes have skyrocketed over the last decades and since investors from all skill and awareness levels are joining the market, understanding investor psychology is increasingly necessary. Advances in technology have eliminated the obstacles to entry for new investors.

Home ownership, a policy blunder

Home ownership, a policy blunder

Housing is an important issue today and will probably remain so for the foreseeable future. Governments would have to implement land policies and create incentives. I would gear those incentives towards providing housing options by supporting the rental market. Creating options where the market has not provided can restore balance.

Home ownership, a policy blunder

Home ownership, a policy blunder

Home ownership, a policy blunder

Written by Ahmad Halak

Housing

Housing is an important issue today and will probably remain so for the foreseeable future. Governments would have to implement land policies and create incentives. I would gear those incentives towards providing housing options by supporting the rental market. Creating options where the market has not provided can restore balance.

At the core of government policy is solving one of society’s challenges, housing. Adequate housing is essential to protect the health and safety of individuals. It’s a simple right for all inhabitants. The approach taken in Canada, did not achieve its goals and failed to address a growing housing crisis.

In this article, we will discuss how governments implement programs in housing to create artificial economic expansion. We will also talk about the impact our society on our decisions and how it’s adding to the current housing crisis. The discussion will cover considerations for home buyers and what they should consider when making a decision.

We use home ownership as a source of economic growth

Governments use home ownership and the housing sector as a source of economic growth. They do this by implementing policies that promote home ownership. These policies include all from incentives to relax rules around qualifying for a mortgage. Some of these policies financially trap owners and cannot provide sustainable and long-term economic growth and fix the housing mess.

A home is not a source of economic gain because it does not provide output or production of any good or service. We should make investments in living options for all Canadians, not just those seeking ownership. Owning a single home has turned into a societal norm. As a result, builders and potential buyers do not favor other housing choices.

To promote economic growth for the long-haul, we need investments in productive capital and infrastructure. This includes investing in roads, railways, factories, and research labs. We should also invest in Canada’s approximately $100 billion infrastructure deficit, creating another source of economic growth for both the short and the long term. Reliable infrastructure enables an economy to function at its full capacity.

Social norms, habits, and constructs boost the demand for home ownership

Home ownership is not just a social construct, but also an expensive social practice. Many occupations depend on it; lawyers, mortgage agents, financial planners, banks, tellers, and real estate agents. The list goes on. Advocates of ownership claim that buying is always better than renting. This is a common misconception. Ownership comes with other costs other than mortgage payments that this claim ignores. Like Upton Sinclair said, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.

There are other hidden and indirect costs of premature home home ownership. This includes costs like labor immobility and the opportunity cost of capital. Owning a housing can lead you to lose your labor versatility when you are looking at job opportunities outside your area. Also, the equity you build in a house could be invested elsewhere for a higher return, if available. The latter is what we refer to as the opportunity cost of capital.

So what does this all mean to you?

If you are facing the dilemma of whether to rent or buy, some , try this rent vs. buy calculator first. This is a simple tool that can help you make a sound decision. This calculation takes into consideration a variety of factors that should be part of the math when considering to purchase a home.

Home ownership is not for everybody. As with any other major financial decision, we must assess it adequately. Renting is fine, as long as we are saving and investing for the future.

Conclusion

Housing is an important issue today and will probably remain so for the foreseeable future. Governments would have to implement land policies and create incentives. I would gear those incentives towards providing housing options by supporting the rental market. Creating options where the market has not provided can restore balance.

Economic growth should be sourced from sustainably, where an impact has a lasting effect on our quality of life. Finally, buying a home is a big decision and requires careful financial consideration and planning. However, making rational decisions can be difficult under social pressure so we must be aware so we don’t surrender to it.

 

Related Articles

Should I rent an apartment or buy a condo?

Should I rent an apartment or buy a condo?

Owning a home is not always better than renting. In fact, we demonstrate that in especially hot housing markets like Toronto’s, renting is far cheaper than buying. This is true even when considering moderate future price increases. The example uses the rent vs buy calculator and is based on a 1-bedroom apartment I was trying to decide between buying or renting.

Six common mistakes investors make

Six common mistakes investors make

Trade volumes have skyrocketed over the last decades and since investors from all skill and awareness levels are joining the market, understanding investor psychology is increasingly necessary. Advances in technology have eliminated the obstacles to entry for new investors.

Home ownership, a policy blunder

Home ownership, a policy blunder

Housing is an important issue today and will probably remain so for the foreseeable future. Governments would have to implement land policies and create incentives. I would gear those incentives towards providing housing options by supporting the rental market. Creating options where the market has not provided can restore balance.

Money saving tips and tricks for the COVID-19 pandemic

Money saving tips and tricks for the COVID-19 pandemic

Money saving tips and tricks for the COVID-19 pandemic

Written by Ahmad Halak

Planning and being patient, establishing proper habits, actively seeking savings in your regular expenses are themes drawn from the list above. This pandemic can teach us a thing or two and leave us with valuable lessons learned.

Shop smart

  • Be aware of your buying habits, sit on decisions, and set a budget. The convenience of shopping online while being at home makes it easy to make spontaneous purchases.
  • If you need to shop, shop online to find good deals. We expect prices to be more favorable than in-store prices because of fierce competition and cheaper overhead costs associated with online shopping.
  • Use price matching apps like Flipp to find the best prices on groceries; plan to avoid line-ups and avoid busy days.

Re-examine your bills

  • Many insurance companies are handing out savings to consumers because of lower accident volumes and driving activity. Be sure to call your insurance company to inquire about savings related to the COVID-19
    pandemic.
  • Reduce your service for cell data, since you are indoors and are on the WiFi network. I strongly suggest going on a prepaid plan with a second level telecom company.
  • Leverage the current economic situation to negotiate better rates for your home services such as phone and internet by phoning your service providers.

Avoid unhealthy habits

  • Avoid buying unhealthy snacks and alcohol and bringing them home, the more accessible they are the more you consume. Limit takeout purchases by setting a budget. I recommend setting a budget of $100 a month/per person.

Preserve existing savings

  • Shop around for best paying savings accounts as interest earnings on savings have dropped.
    Be sure to guard your emergency savings in a savings account, which has a higher interest rate than a checking account.
  • Inflation could creep into our economy and reduce the value of your cash holdings. Savings above and beyond funds set aside for a rainy day (3 to 5 months’ worth of expenses) are best used in a savings account since we you can earn higher interest.

Conclusion

Planning and being patient, establishing proper habits, actively seeking savings in your regular expenses are themes drawn from the list above. This pandemic can teach us a thing or two and leave us with valuable lessons learned.

I hope the money-saving tips can help you during these stressful times. Let me know what tips and tricks you have been using in the comments section below.

Related Articles

Should I rent an apartment or buy a condo?

Should I rent an apartment or buy a condo?

Owning a home is not always better than renting. In fact, we demonstrate that in especially hot housing markets like Toronto’s, renting is far cheaper than buying. This is true even when considering moderate future price increases. The example uses the rent vs buy calculator and is based on a 1-bedroom apartment I was trying to decide between buying or renting.

Six common mistakes investors make

Six common mistakes investors make

Trade volumes have skyrocketed over the last decades and since investors from all skill and awareness levels are joining the market, understanding investor psychology is increasingly necessary. Advances in technology have eliminated the obstacles to entry for new investors.

Home ownership, a policy blunder

Home ownership, a policy blunder

Housing is an important issue today and will probably remain so for the foreseeable future. Governments would have to implement land policies and create incentives. I would gear those incentives towards providing housing options by supporting the rental market. Creating options where the market has not provided can restore balance.